Contact Us
Categories
- Judgment creditors
- Fractional Investment
- Section 1031 transactions
- Investment
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Arbitration
- Breach
- Closing
- Closing Disclosure
- Condemnation
- Good Faith Estimate
- HUD-1 Settlement Statement
- Lenders
- Truth in Lending Act
- Zoning Regulations
- “Know Before You Owe”
- Commercial Real Estate
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs)
- Land Use Law
- Mortgage
- Planning and Zoning
- Purchase Contract
- Real Estate Law
- Reverse mortgages
- Affordable Housing
- Economic Development
- Homeowners Association
- Landlord
- Lease
- Property Titling
- Rescission
- Same-Sex Couples
- Tenant
- URLTA
- Agritourism
- Condominium
- Deed
- Drones
- Horizontal Property Law
- Kentucky Condominium Act
- Land Surveys
- LBAR
- National Association of Realtors (NAR)
- Overlay Zoning
- plat
- Property Lines
- Property Survey
- Real Estate Agents
- Rural Areas
- Steenrod v. Louisville Yacht Club Association
- Trulia
- Uncategorized
- Zillow
- Benningfield v. Zinmeister
- Boards of Adjustment
- Building Inspection
- Co-Signing
- Code Enforcement
- Commercial Lease
- Conditional uses
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”)
- Credit Report
- Credit Score
- Deeds
- Dog owners
- Emergency Preparedness
- Emotional Support Animals
- ESIGN
- Exclusive Use Clause
- Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
- FICO
- Homebuyers
- Inspection
- Insurance Companies
- Insured
- KRS 383.500
- KRS §258.235(4)
- KRS §383.580
- Loans
- Multi-unit properties
- Natural Disasters
- Occupancy Fraud
- Screening
- Security Deposit
- Servicers
- The Loan Estimate form
- Title Insurance Policies
- Truth in Lending Statement
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Variances
- Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
- "Right-of-Way Agents"
- Bluegrass Pipeline
- Boilerplate Language
- Conservation Easement
- Easement
- Eminent Domain
- General Forms
- Kentucky landowners
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
I Love It When a Comprehensive Plan Comes Together
It’s that time again – Lexington has been and remains busy assembling its 2018 Comprehensive Plan, titled “Imagine Lexington,” which will provide guidance on how the city will regulate land use over the next five years. This is a complex process that takes place in two phases. The recently concluded Phase I has already set out the goals and objectives of the plan, which we’ll examine in this blog post. The next phase, Elements and Implementation, may take the remainder of 2018 to hash out, although the Planning Commission suggests it will draft it through the summer. This plan is not just mandated by law; it helps mold a vision for the community of how it handles growth and expansion, which will shape the city for decades to come.
Why a Comprehensive Plan?
A key aspect of land use regulation in a city is the creation of a Comprehensive Plan (“Comp Plan”). In fact, Kentucky statute KRS 100.183 requires communities engaged in land use regulation to create or revise a Comp Plan every five years. The Comp Plan is a top-down policy that gives planners a “road map” for regulating growth, development, and redevelopment. For instance, the Comp Plan is a significant part of zone change evaluations, generally ensuring that changes in property usage follow the community’s vision for itself.
2018 Comprehensive Plan – Goals and Objectives
KRS 100.187 mandates that a comp plan has a statement of goals and objectives, “which shall serve as a guide for the physical development and economic and social well-being of the planning unit…” Lexington’s Urban County Council approved the Goals and Objectives portion of the comp plan – Phase I – in November of 2017. This piece of the comp plan includes 21 goals listed under seven broad themes, which we’ll take one at a time:
-
Theme A - Growing Successful Neighborhoods
The goals here are to expand housing choices, support infill and redevelopment, provide well-designed neighborhoods and communities, and address community facilities. Generally speaking, there’s nothing groundbreaking about any of these goals, which mirror goals from Lexington’s 2013 Comprehensive Plan. Generally, this theme promotes higher-density and mixed housing, more infill, and more schools, libraries and other social services. Though these goals are seemingly uncontroversial, they can become so at times, as established neighborhoods often balk at increasing density in nearby vacant or underutilized areas.
-
Theme B - Protecting the Environment
Lexington’s comp plan will continue to implement a Consent Decree reached with the Environmental Protection Agency, which is a laudable goal, considering it is mandatory . It will also endeavor to reduce the area’s carbon footprint and enact environmentally-sustainable practices. These goals remain largely unchanged from the 2013 Comp Plan.
-
Theme C - Creating Jobs and Prosperity
The comp plan has the goal of showcasing local assets to create jobs as well as attract and recruit better jobs and job-seekers. There is also a goal to identify “publicly-controlled economic development land” and amend the Comp Plan as necessary should it interfere with economic development. Recent announcements that the LFUCG is pursuing a property swap with the University of Kentucky for land in the Coldstream Research Park may help with securing this vitally needed economic development land.
-
Theme D - Improving a Desirable Community
Here, the Comp Plan puts forth the goal of creating a more pedestrian-friendly environment, focusing on alternative transportation infrastructure and better mass transit options along major corridors. There is a cultural component as well, protecting historic resources and supporting public art. These goals, too, remain largely unchanged from the 2013 Comp Plan.
-
Theme E - Maintaining a Balance between Planning for Urban Uses and Safeguarding Rural Land
This section is far and away the most controversial component of the Comp Plan debate. Lexington has not added to its supply of developable land (land located within the Urban Service Boundary) since 1996, and many development, real estate, and building industry representatives expressed the sentiment that it was time to add additional developable land. Conversely, agricultural community representatives and rural preservationists felt there was an adequate supply of land within the existing boundary. Ultimately, a compromise (of sorts) was struck. Rather than elect to add additional development land as part of the Comp Plan update, one goal states that it will preserve the current boundaries, while simultaneously commissioning a study on the most effective way to expand the urban service boundary in the future without putting unreasonable pressure on the surrounding agricultural areas. This study is proposed to conclude on July 1, 2020, so it seems likely there will be no movement on the Urban Services Area boundary until sometime after that date. Until then, development will be required to occur within the current Urban Service Boundary.
-
Theme F - Implementing the Plan for Lexington-Fayette County and the Bluegrass
There are three simple goals to this section: involve Lexington-Fayette residents in the planning process, implement the full comp plan, and increase regional planning. The implementation portion involves creating a system of metrics to mark the progress of the plan, as well as criteria to guide zoning decisions.
What Next?
The Elements and Implementation portion, as stated before, may be here as soon as the summer or as late as the end of the year. The Planning Commission is slated to hold meetings and other opportunities for public input throughout the process to gauge public buy-in to practical aspects of implementation. This Comp Plan will shape Lexington for at least the next five years, but the effects will be felt for decades, so interested stakeholders should continue to be involved in the process.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.