Contact Us
Categories
- Kentucky Consumer Protection Act
- Judgment creditors
- Fractional Investment
- Section 1031 transactions
- Investment
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Arbitration
- Breach
- Closing
- Closing Disclosure
- Good Faith Estimate
- HUD-1 Settlement Statement
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Lenders
- Minimum wage
- Truth in Lending Act
- “Know Before You Owe”
- Condemnation
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs)
- Mortgage
- Planning and Zoning
- Real Estate Law
- Reverse mortgages
- Zoning Regulations
- Affordable Housing
- Commercial Real Estate
- Economic Development
- Homeowners Association
- Land Use Law
- Landlord
- Lease
- Property Titling
- Purchase Contract
- Rescission
- Same-Sex Couples
- Tenant
- URLTA
- Agritourism
- Condominium
- Deed
- Drones
- Horizontal Property Law
- Kentucky Condominium Act
- Land Surveys
- LBAR
- National Association of Realtors (NAR)
- Overlay Zoning
- Plat
- Property Lines
- Property Survey
- Real Estate Agents
- Rural Areas
- Steenrod v. Louisville Yacht Club Association
- Trulia
- Uncategorized
- Zillow
- "Right-of-Way Agents"
- Benningfield v. Zinmeister
- Bluegrass Pipeline
- Boards of Adjustment
- Building Inspection
- Co-Signing
- Code Enforcement
- Commercial Lease
- Conditional uses
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”)
- Credit Report
- Credit Score
- Deeds
- Dog owners
- Easement
- Emergency Preparedness
- Eminent Domain
- Emotional Support Animals
- ESIGN
- Exclusive Use Clause
- Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
- FICO
- Homebuyers
- Inspection
- Insurance Companies
- Insured
- Kentucky landowners
- KRS 383.500
- KRS §258.235(4)
- KRS §383.580
- Loans
- Multi-unit properties
- Natural Disasters
- Occupancy Fraud
- Screening
- Security Deposit
- Servicers
- The Loan Estimate form
- Title Insurance Policies
- Truth in Lending Statement
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Variances
- Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
- Boilerplate Language
- Conservation Easement
- General Forms
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
Showing 1 post in U.S. Supreme Court.
Regulatory Takings Cases and the Relevant Parcel: Murr v. Wisconsin
This summer, in Murr v. Wisconsin,[1] the United States Supreme Court will make an important decision on property rights and regulatory takings under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. At issue in the case is whether two legally distinct parcels of land can be treated as one for regulatory purposes if they share common ownership. In a time when planning and zoning regulations change sporadically, this case has broad implications for owners of commercial property, farmers, developers, mining operations and others that hold legal title to adjoining properties, so these groups should pay particular attention to this case.
[1] Murr v. Wisconsin, 359 Wisc. 2d 675 (Wis. App. 2014), rev. denied, 862 N.W.2d 899 (Wis. 2015) More >