Contact Us
Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Join us on LinkedInCategories
- Compliance
- Disaster relief
- Income Tax
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- Main Street Lending Program
- Remote Work
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
- Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)
- Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
- CARES Act
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- COVID-19
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- Liability Waivers
- Miller, as Next Friend of her Minor Child, E.M. v. House of Boom Kentucky, LLC
- Intangible Assets
- Tax consequences
- Taxation
- Community Banks
- Dodd-Frank Act
- SEC Crowdfunding Rules
- Corporate
- Diversity
- Judgment creditors
- Consumer Debts
- Employment Law
- Entrepreneur
- ERISA
- Lenders
- Litigation
- Municipal Liability
- Small Business
- Business Entities
- Equity Development
- Investment
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Sales and Dissolutions
- Business Formation and Planning
- Closely Held Businesses
- Corporate and Business Tax
- Uncategorized
What is the FTC looking at when it reviews merger agreements?
In our last post, we spoke about a proposed merger between office supply chains Office Depot and Staples. As we noted, Office Depot shareholders recently voted to go forward with the acquisition, but the Federal Trade Commission still has to review the agreement and make a decision, which will determine whether or not the process can move forward.
In reviewing any merger agreement, the Federal Trade Commission-or the Department of Justice, depending on which agency reviews the agreement-an important consideration is the impact the transaction will have on the market. Speaking generally, federal law prohibits mergers and acquisitions that would potentially harm market competition by creating a monopoly on goods or services.
According to the FTC, competitive harm often stems not from the agreement as a whole, but from how the deal will impact certain areas of business. Problems can arise when a proposed merger has too much of a limiting effect on competition based on the type of products or services being sold and the geographic area in which the company is doing business.
With that having been said, most mergers-95 percent, according to the FTC-present no issues in terms of market competition. Those that do present issues are often resolved by tweaking the agreement so as to address any competitive threats. In cases where the reviewing agency and the businesses cannot agree on a solution, litigation may be necessary, but it often isn't.
Any company that plans on going forward with a merger or acquisition needs to have a clear understanding of the law and the review process the Federal Trade Commission goes through when scrutinizing proposals. This is especially the case if issues come up regarding competitive threats, since these can halt a proposal from moving forward. An experienced attorney will know how to structure an agreement so as to minimize such threats, as well as how to navigate the legal process if problems do arise.
