Lobbying Affiliate: MML&K Government Solutions
{ Banner Image }

Healthcare Law Blog

Comprehensive Healthcare law services.
It's kind of our bag.

Contact Us

250 Character(s) Remaining
Type the following characters: romeo, niner, six, foxtrot, six, hotel

* Indicates a required field.

Categories

McBrayer Blogs

Related Blogs

Showing 3 posts tagged SCOTUS.

Recent Supreme Court Decisions and the Impact on Reproductive Rights

Recent United States Supreme Court decisions have delivered small temporary wins for reproductive rights. A unanimous Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the FDA’s rule for prescribing and dispensing abortion pills. On June 13, 2024, a unanimous court decided in Food and Drug Administration v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine that the anti-abortion doctors and medical groups that challenged the expansion of access to mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medical abortions, lacked standing. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court, acknowledged the challengers’ “sincere legal, moral, ideological, and policy objections” to elective abortion and to the FDA’s changes to the conditions on the use of mifepristone. However, the challengers to the FDA regulation failed to show how they had been harmed, as they do not themselves prescribe the medication. The court further found that merely objecting to abortion and to the FDA’s policies are not enough to establish standing and bring a case to federal court. The challengers contended that having to treat patients who suffered complications from using the drug is a harm to them and similarly convicted providers in other respects, such as diverting resources, increasing the likelihood of lawsuits, and increasing insurance costs. Justice Kavanaugh continued to describe the speculative nature of the challengers’ attempt to establish standing. If the challengers could sue with this theory, it could open a dangerous door to challenge “almost any policy affecting public health.” More >

SCOTUS Blocks OSHA ETS; Healthcare Mandate Moves Forward

Thursday afternoon, the United States Supreme Court ruled to block the Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) issued by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that would require private employers of 100 or more workers to mandate employee vaccination against COVID-19, or weekly testing for the virus. The Court upheld, however, a similar rule for healthcare employers contracted with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) as further outlined below. More >

Implied False Certification - Supreme Court Upholds New False Claims Act Standard

While the news for healthcare practitioners regarding regulatory liability under Federal law had largely been positive as of late, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a new standard of liability under the False Claims Act in the case of Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The standard of liability approved by SCOTUS is referred to as “implied false certification” and the implications for healthcare providers are numerous. More >

Lexington, KYLouisville, KYFrankfort, KYFrankfort, KY: MML&K Government Solutions