Contact Us
Categories
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Residents
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- Medical Spas
- medical billing
- No Surprises Act
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Workplace health
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- Code Enforcement
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employment Law
- FFCRA
- CARES Act
- Nursing Home Reform Act
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- SB 150
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- Locum Tenens
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- Senate Bill 4
- Chronic Pain Management
- HIPAA
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- EHR Systems
- Hospice
- ICD-10
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Drug Screening
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Physician Assistants
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Urinalysis
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- Alternative Payment Models
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Charitable Hospitals
- Compliance
- Data Breach
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HPSA
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Part D
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telehealth
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Hydrocodone
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- Agreed Order
- APRNs
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Maintenance Standard
- Overpayments
- Re-validation
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- Webinar
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Appeal
- Chiropractic services
- Chronic Care Management
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Compliance Officer
- Compounding
- CPR
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- Essential Health Benefits
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- ICD-9
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Long-term care communities
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Ophthalmological services
- Outsourcing facility
- Physician Compare website
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- State Health Plan
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- Texting
- "Plan of Correction"
- Affinity Health Plan
- Arbitration
- Audit
- Cadillac tax
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Daycare centers
- Decertification
- Denied Claims
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Health Reform
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- Individual mandate
- Inpatient Care
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kynect
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- LLC v. Sutter
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- National Institutes of Health
- Network provider agreement
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Privacy
- Payors
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Quality reporting
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Upcoding
- UPS
- “Superuser”
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Autism/ASD
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Call Coverage
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- House Bill 104
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Abuse and Waste
- Center for Disease Control
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- House Bill 1
- House Bill 4
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Pain Management Facilities
- Sunshine Act
- Employee Agreement
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
THE PERILS OF PRESCRIBING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
As the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure’s (“KBML”) implementing regulations for House Bill 1 are now effective on an emergency basis for the next six months, physicians, nurse practitioners, and other licensed prescribers have specific statutory and regulatory requirements establishing when and how they may prescribe controlled substances. These rules must be followed or physicians and others may face serious consequences that include criminal misdemeanor offenses, loss of prescribing privileges, and disciplinary actions against professional licenses. All practitioners must pay careful attention to these rules because even minor violations may create problems. Because the KBML’s regulations are more comprehensive than the requirements of House Bill 1, a great deal of confusion exists concerning what physicians and practitioners are required to do and when. Recognizing that compliance with its emergency regulations may mean major changes in the way physicians practice medicine, the KBML has announced that it expects full compliance by October 1, which creates a welcome grace period. While the ambiguities and details will be worked out over the course of the next six months, physicians should take heed and incorporate these things into their practices.
- Assess your practice to assure that it is not an unintentional pain management facility that must register with the Cabinet or the KBML
The definition of a pain management facility is so broad that it may cover private physician practices in unexpected ways. House Bill 1 defines a pain management facility to be a facility where the majority of the patients receiving treatment from the practitioners at the facility are provided treatment for pain that includes the use of controlled substances, and (i) the facility’s practice primary component is the treatment of pain; or (ii) the facility advertises in any medium for any type of pain management services. This means that even though a physician’s specialty practice may be something other than pain management, if more than 50% of the patients are treated for pain and prescribed controlled substances for pain, then the practice may constitute a pain treatment facility regardless of whether the practice is an urgent treatment center, an internal medicine practice, or other medical practice. Neither the statute nor the KBML’s regulation is clear about whether a subspecialty practice like orthopedic surgery would constitute a pain treatment facility in the event that a majority of its patients present seeking treatment for pain or painful conditions. If the practice advertises that it treats pain, then it qualifies as a pain treatment facility.
Pain treatment facilities must register with the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and obtain a license if the ownership of the entity includes only non-physicians or with the KBML if the ownership of the entity consists of physicians. The KBML has noted on its website that the deadline for registration is September 1, 2012.
Major exceptions to the classification as a pain treatment facility exist for hospitals which include hospital clinics and the offices of their employed physicians; educational institutions; hospice programs; ASCs; and long term care facilities. Physicians should know that failure to register when required may constitute a misdemeanor and result in disciplinary action.
- Register for KASPER
House Bill 1 contains strong requirements that every physician who holds a DEA permit must register to use KASPER. In addition, the KBML requires physicians to register within three days of receipt of DEA permit. In fact, the KBML regulations state that to lawfully prescribe controlled substances, a physician must have the DEA permit and register with KASPER.
- Make a KASPER inquiry every time a controlled substance is prescribed
House Bill 1 and the KBML establish different standards for prescribing controlled substances and requirements for KASPER inquiries. House Bill 1 applies to Schedule II controlled substances and Schedule III controlled substances containing hydrocodone. The KBML’s regulations on the other hand apply to all Schedule II and Schedule III controlled substances and selected Schedule IV and V controlled substances that have been determined to be highly addictive. These Schedule IV and V medications include Ambien, Anorexics, Ativan, Klonopin, Librium, Nubain, Oxazepam, Phentermine, Soma, Stadol, Stadol NS, Tramadol, Valium, Versed, and Xanax. While House Bill 1 only requires KASPER inquiries when Schedule II drugs and Schedule III drugs containing hydrocodone are prescribed, the KBML requires that a physician request and review a KASPER report before prescribing any of the controlled substances listed above.
Exceptions to the requirement for KASPER inquiries exist for hospice or end of life patients, cancer patients, residents of a long term care facility, and for patients experiencing an emergency. Interestingly, the requirements for physicians to obtain KASPER reports for hospital patients differ between House Bill 1 and the KBML regulations. House Bill 1 states that an admitting physician should query KASPER and then make the report part of the patient’s medical record. An inpatient’s subsequent physicians satisfy the KASPER inquiry requirement when they review the report in the medical record prior to prescribing controlled substances and prior to discharging the patient with a prescription for no more than a 72 hour supply of controlled substances.
Both House Bill 1 and the KBML regulations have mandatory requirements for KASPER inquiries. Because of the penalties associated with a failure to adhere to the requirements, physicians should establish a KASPER inquiry process as part of the routine practice of medicine even if this means making inquiries that may be unnecessary. Regulators have promised that the KASPER inquiry system will be quick and convenient for users.
- Implement the prescribing standards for controlled substances into the routine practice of medicine
Both House Bill 1 and the KBML regulations establish prescribing standards for controlled substances that must be followed and have the potential to subject a physician to serious disciplinary action for violations. In fact, the KBML has also revised its disciplinary regulations to create new standards to make it easier to issue emergency orders restricting physicians from prescribing or practicing. The standards for prescribing are complicated and vary based upon the timing of the prescribing.
- Initial Prescribing
For initial prescribing of controlled substances, a physician must verify the patient’s ID, perform a history and focused physical that is documented; obtain and review a KASPER report; make a deliberate decision to prescribe controlled substances that is medically appropriate after weighing the risks and benefits; prescribe only the amount of medication necessary to treat a specific medical complaint for a definite, pre-determined time period; not prescribe long-acting or controlled release opioids for acute pain; and explain to the patient the need to discontinue the medication when the patient’s condition is resolved.
- Prescribing for more than 3 months
If a physician intends to prescribe any controlled substance for a period more than three months, the physician shall perform and document a thorough history that includes patient and family history of abuse, dependence and psychosocial history; perform and document a comprehensive physical exam; obtain medical records from other physicians who have previously treated the patient’s complaint if necessary to justify the long-term prescribing of controlled substances; establish and document a working diagnosis; formulate a treatment plan with specific and measureable goals; screen the patient for abuse, dependence and psychiatric or psychological conditions that may create a diversion risk and make appropriate referrals; obtain a baseline urine drug screen and not prescribe controlled substances if the test indicates improper use; obtain the patient’s’ informed consent to the long term use of controlled substances; and try non-controlled substances treatments prior to prescribing.
- Long Term Prescribing
When a physician decides to prescribe controlled substances beyond the initial 3 month period, the KBML emergency regulations require: seeing the patient once a month until medication is titrated and not causing side effects and that sufficient monitoring is in place; evaluating the patient and reviewing the working diagnosis; reviewing functional goals and obtaining consent to speak with others; managing breakthrough pain by identifying the triggers and attempting non-controlled medications; performing or assuring that the patient’s primary care physician has performed an annual preventive health screening or exam; reviewing KASPER reports at least every three months and taking action immediately if the report indicates that the patient is not taking the medication or diverting medications and reporting it to law enforcement; stopping or tapering prescribing; performing random urine drug screens; performing random unannounced pill counts; and discontinuation of treatment and to refer an addiction specialist when there is no improvement, significant adverse effects of drug-seeking behavior or diversion.
Additional standards have been promulgated for physicians who prescribe within the emergency department.
- Documentation Requirements
Physicians must document all relevant information in the patient’s medical record in sufficient detail to provide for (1) a meaningful diagnosis and treatment; (2) the safe and medically appropriate assumption of care by another physician at any given time; and (3) the KBML to determine whether the physician is conforming to professional standards for prescribing.
- Patient Education Requirements
In addition to the professional standards for prescribing controlled substances, the KBML has declared that it is the acceptable and prevailing medical practice to educate patients on the following matters about controlled substances through verbal or written counseling including proper use; impact on driving and work safety; effect of use during pregnancy; potential for overdose and appropriate response to overdose; and safe storage and proper disposal of controlled substances. This, of course, means that a physician must provide educational consultation or materials to patients or risk finding that
Conclusion
House Bill 1 and the KBML’s emergency regulations change how physicians must operate on a daily basis and interact with their patients. The Governor’s Office has announced that public hearings on the KBML regulations will be held on September 26th and 27th, 2012 in Frankfort. These meetings will provide an opportunity for comments on the KBML regulations. House Bill 1, on the other hand, has become law, is incorporated into Kentucky’s statutes, and is not subject to anything but legislative change. Regardless concern about the ability of physicians to perform all the tasks are required by the emergency regulations, the KBML’s regulations are now effective even though a grace period for enforcement exists. Good luck!
Lisa English Hinkle is a Member of McBrayer law. Ms. Hinkle concentrates her practice area in healthcare law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. She can be reached at lhinkle@mcbrayerfirm.com or at (859) 231-8780, ext. 1256.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.