Contact Us
Categories
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Residents
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- Medical Spas
- medical billing
- No Surprises Act
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Workplace health
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- Code Enforcement
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employment Law
- FFCRA
- CARES Act
- Nursing Home Reform Act
- COVID-19
- SB 150
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- Locum Tenens
- Senate Bill 4
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- HIPAA
- Chronic Pain Management
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- EHR Systems
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Hospice
- ICD-10
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Drug Screening
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Physician Assistants
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Urinalysis
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- Alternative Payment Models
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Charitable Hospitals
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HPSA
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Part D
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telehealth
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Hydrocodone
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Webinar
- Agreed Order
- APRNs
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Maintenance Standard
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- Overpayments
- Re-validation
- Texting
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Appeal
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Chiropractic services
- Chronic Care Management
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Compliance Officer
- Compounding
- CPR
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- Essential Health Benefits
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- ICD-9
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Kynect
- Long-term care communities
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- National Institutes of Health
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Ophthalmological services
- Outsourcing facility
- Physician Compare website
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- Social Media
- State Health Plan
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- "Plan of Correction"
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Affinity Health Plan
- Arbitration
- Audit
- Cadillac tax
- Call Coverage
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Daycare centers
- Decertification
- Denied Claims
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Health Reform
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- House Bill 104
- Individual mandate
- Inpatient Care
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- LLC v. Sutter
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Network provider agreement
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Privacy
- Payors
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Quality reporting
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Spousal coverage
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Upcoding
- UPS
- “Superuser”
- Autism/ASD
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Center for Disease Control
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Sunshine Act
- Abuse and Waste
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- House Bill 1
- House Bill 4
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Pain Management Facilities
- Employee Agreement
- Health Care Law
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
McBrayer Blogs
The New Business of Prescribing Controlled Substances
Out of the heated debate between the Attorney General representing law enforcement and the Kentucky Medical Association representing physicians, the Legislature enacted Kentucky’s “Pill Mill Bill,” which is sweeping legislation designed to combat prescription drug abuse through increased regulation of pain clinics and greater scrutiny of prescribing practices by various agencies of state government. The Pill Mill Bill becomes effective on July 20, 2012 and imposes requirements not just for doctors practicing pain medicine, but for all practitioners who prescribe controlled substances. In addition to placing significant limits on who can own a pain clinic and how a pain clinic is operated, the legislation requires Kentucky’s licensing boards, including the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and the Kentucky Board of Nursing, to enact new regulations that impose standards for physicians, nurses and other practitioners when a Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substance is prescribed. Because the Pill Mill Bill imposes sweeping changes for pain clinics and prescribing practices, all health care providers and their patients will face new challenges as procedures change. Regardless of whether the legislation stops the shifting pattern of drug abuse from illicit to prescription drugs, physicians are at the center of the Pill Mill Bill and are now required to reduce the risk of diversion and abuse of prescription drugs when treating a patient’s pain. Whether the collateral effect of the Pill Mill Bill is the serious under treatment of pain is yet to be seen.
-
Pain Clinics
One of the most important public health trends of the last ten years is the shifting pattern of drug abuse from heroin, cocaine, and marijuana to prescription drugs that are opioid based. Kentucky’s Pill Mill Bill was specifically designed to target “pill mills” and pain clinics. By defining a pain clinic as a facility where the majority of patients of the practitioners at the facility are provided treatment for pain that includes the use of controlled substances, or where the clinic’s primary practice component is the treatment of pain, or where the facility advertises in any medium for any type of pain management services, the legislation is meant to cover any practice that holds itself out as treating chronic pain. For these clinics that meet the definition, the legislation requires that a physician having a full and active license to practice medicine in Kentucky shall have an ownership or investment interest in a pain management facility. The legislation, however, “grandfathers” non-physician owned pain management facilities that were operating before the legislation was signed by Governor Beshear unless there is an administrative sanction or criminal conviction related to controlled substances imposed on the facility or any person employed by the facility for an act or omission done within the scope of the facility’s licensure or the person’s employment.
Regardless of the ownership of the facility, beginning on July 20, 2012, all pain management facilities must meet strict staffing requirements. The legislation requires at least one of the owners of the facility or an owner’s designee (who is a physician, such as a medical director who is employed by and under the supervision of the owner) to be physically present practicing medicine in the facility for at least fifty percent (50%) of the time that patients are present in the facility. More importantly, the physician owner or owner’s designee must meet specific specialty or sub-specialty certification requirements or have completed an accredited residency or fellowship in pain management. The aim of these requirements is to assure that a pain clinic has a physician who is trained and certified in pain medicine present when patients are treated. This means that a pain clinic may not be staffed with mid-level practitioners without the presence of a physician at least half the time the clinic is open.
New Requirements for Prescribing Controlled Substances
In addition to regulating pain clinics, the Pill Mill Bill imposes specific clinical and documentation standards on all practitioners prescribing any Schedule II controlled substance or a Schedule III controlled substance containing hydrocodone, irrespective of whether the practitioner is practicing in a “pain management facility” as defined by the legislation. Now, by statute, a practitioner who prescribes any Schedule II controlled substance or a Schedule III controlled substance containing hydrocodone is required to (1) obtain a complete medical history and conduct a physical examination of the patient and document the information in the patient’s medical record; (2) perform a Kentucky All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting (“KASPER”) system search for all available data on a patient; (3) make a written treatment plan stating the objectives of the treatment and diagnostic examinations required; (4) discuss the risks and benefits of the use of controlled substances with the patient, the patient’s parent, or a legal guardian that include the risk of tolerance and drug dependence; and (5)obtain written consent for the treatment. The legislation further requires the practitioner to review the course of treatment at reasonable intervals and provide any new information about the treatment to the patient. As part of the review of the course of treatment, a practitioner is required to query the KASPER system not less than once every three (3) months for all available data on the patient and review that data before issuing any new prescription or refills for the patient for any Schedule II controlled substance or a Schedule III controlled substance containing hydrocodone.
The legislation even goes so far as to dictate the required content of a patient’s medical record who receives controlled substances. The legislation requires a practitioner who prescribes any Schedule II controlled substance or a Schedule III controlled substance containing hydrocodone to keep accurate, readily accessible, and complete medical records that include medical history and physical examination results; diagnostic, therapeutic, and laboratory results; evaluations and consultations; treatment objectives; discussion of risks, benefits, and limitations of treatments; treatments; a list of medications, including date, type, dosage, and quantity prescribed or dispensed; instructions and agreements; and conduct of periodic review of the patient’s file.
Requirements for Licensing Boards
State licensing boards are now required to promulgate administrative regulations governing prescribing standards and to take enforcement actions involving improper prescribing practices. The legislation requires state licensing boards that include the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, the Kentucky Board of Nursing, the Kentucky Board of Dentistry, the Kentucky Board of Optometric Examiners and the State Board of Podiatry to issue regulations by no later than September 1, 2012 that address the following: mandatory prescribing and dispensing standards for controlled substances; prohibiting practitioners from dispensing greater than a forty-eight (48) hour supply of any Schedule II controlled substance or a Schedule III controlled substance containing hydrocodone unless the dispensing is done as part of a licensed narcotic treatment program; a procedure for temporarily suspending, limiting or restricting a license where a substantial likelihood exists that the unrestricted practice by the licensee would constitute a danger to the health, welfare or safety of patients or the public; and a procedure for the expedited review of complaints filed against licensees for prescribing or dispensing of controlled substances that is designed to start an investigation within seven (7) days of a complaint being filed and produce a charging decision on the complaint within one-hundred twenty (120) days, unless an extension for a definite period of time is requested by a law enforcement agency due to an ongoing criminal investigation.
Kentucky’s Pill Mill Bill has made clinical standards for prescribing controlled substances the law, which will require not only pain management facilities but all practitioners prescribing controlled substances to make changes to conform their policies, procedures and operations to the requirements of the law as well as the regulations which will follow. With only a few exceptions, practitioners will have to gather KASPER reports before prescriptions for controlled substances will be issued to patients. Because of the potential liability with licensing boards, practitioners may decide that prescribing pain medications creates too much risk. Consequently, risk also exists that pain will be under-treated. With the strict enforcement climate in Kentucky, all practitioners will need to incorporate the new requirements for prescribing into the their practices. Now, more than ever, compliance efforts must include prescribing practices.
Lisa English Hinkle is a Member of McBrayer law. Ms. Hinkle concentrates her practice area in healthcare law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. She can be reached at lhinkle@mcbrayerfirm.com or at (859) 231-8780, ext. 1256.
Christopher J. Shaughnessy is a member at McBrayer law. Mr. Shaughnessy concentrates his practice area in healthcare law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. He can be reached at cshaughnessy@mcbrayerfirm.com or at (859) 231-8780, ext. 1251.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.