Contact Us
Categories
- Workplace Violence
- Assisted Living Facilities
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Residents
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- Medical Spas
- medical billing
- No Surprises Act
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Workplace health
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- Code Enforcement
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employment Law
- FFCRA
- CARES Act
- Nursing Home Reform Act
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- SB 150
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- Locum Tenens
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- Senate Bill 4
- Chronic Pain Management
- HIPAA
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- EHR Systems
- Hospice
- ICD-10
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Drug Screening
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Mental Health Care
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Physician Assistants
- Qui Tam
- Stark Laws
- Urinalysis
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Care Act
- Alternative Payment Models
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Charitable Hospitals
- Compliance
- Data Breach
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HPSA
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Part D
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telehealth
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Hydrocodone
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- Agreed Order
- APRNs
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Maintenance Standard
- Overpayments
- Re-validation
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- Webinar
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Appeal
- Chiropractic services
- Chronic Care Management
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Compliance Officer
- Compounding
- CPR
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- Essential Health Benefits
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- ICD-9
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Long-term care communities
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Ophthalmological services
- Outsourcing facility
- Physician Compare website
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- State Health Plan
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- Texting
- "Plan of Correction"
- Affinity Health Plan
- Arbitration
- Audit
- Cadillac tax
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Daycare centers
- Decertification
- Denied Claims
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Health Reform
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- Individual mandate
- Inpatient Care
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kynect
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- LLC v. Sutter
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- National Institutes of Health
- Network provider agreement
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Privacy
- Payors
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Payments
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Quality reporting
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Upcoding
- UPS
- “Superuser”
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Autism/ASD
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Call Coverage
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- House Bill 104
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Abuse and Waste
- Center for Disease Control
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- House Bill 1
- House Bill 4
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Pain Management Facilities
- Sunshine Act
- Employee Agreement
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
MAKING NO-SHOWS SHOW YOU THE MONEY: TIPS FOR ADDRESSING THE MISSED APPOINTMENT PROBLEM
Medical school teaches physicians how to treat patients when they show up, but does not address how to treat patients when they do not. No-shows are money losers and a frequent problem for physician offices. Not only do missed appointments disrupt patient flow, but no-shows also equate to lost revenue. Further, when a patient misses an appointment, the overhead related to that no-show remains on the books because the costs of office space, equipment, staff and supplies accumulate regardless of whether or not a patient is seen and treated. Fortunately, there are ways to limit the loss caused by missed appointments.
According to studies conducted by the Medical Group Management Association, a membership association for improved medical practice management, the average no-show rate for physician offices ranges from 5% to 8%, and even greater depending on office size and share of new patients. Patients who miss appointments can be more than a nuisance; they can be a risk management problem. By developing a reasonable missed appointment policy that is consistent, clear, and fair, patients will be aware of the consequences of not showing up. The policy can be implemented as a part of the practice policies, which new patients are given to review and acknowledge by signature. Signage in the waiting room can also serve as a reminder to patients of the importance of appointment keeping. Important points to address in the policy include: how patients will be notified of their upcoming appointment, how to cancel an appointment, if the office charges patients for missed appointments, and how many missed appointments constitute grounds for dismissal.
The American Medical Association’s Code of Ethics allows physicians to charge patients for missed appointments and/or appointments cancelled less than 24 hours in advance, so long as patients are properly advised and the policy is applied to all patient groups. Ethics Opinion 8.01 states: “A physician may charge a patient for a missed appointment or for one cancelled 24 hours in advance if the patient is fully advised that the physician will make such a charge.” Reasonable charges often range from $10 to $25, which indicates charges are usually used as a deterrent rather than an attempt to generate revenue. Of course, this charge must comply with state and federal law.
Historically, physicians have been able to charge Medicare beneficiaries for missed appointments so long as the physician office’s missed appointment policy applies to all patients and the charges for Medicare and non-Medicare patients are the same. This policy was clarified in Transmittal 1279, which added section 30.3.13, “Charges for Missed Appointments,” to the Medicare Claims Processing Manual. In the Transmittal, CMS emphasizes that the charge is for a missed business opportunity, not a charge for a service itself (to which the assignment and limiting charge provisions apply). Because Medicare does not make any payments for missed appointment charges imposed by physicians, claims for missed appointments sent to Medicare will be denied with the reason code 204—This service/equipment/drug is not covered under the patient’s current benefit plan. Accordingly, the physician must bill the Medicare beneficiary directly.
Unfortunately for physicians, this clarification from CMS seems to raise more questions than it answers. In order to charge all patients equally, the physician must first determine that he can charge all patients. Many third party payors do not permit missed appointment charges. These prohibitions can be found in the provider’s contract, listed separately in a manual, addressed in billing policies, or any number of other places. To be certain, it is advisable that physician offices contact each third-party payor for verification that this practice is allowed. Further, CMS has clarified that Medicaid providers are not permitted to bill recipients for missed appointments. Federal regulations prohibit the imposition of cost-sharing on traditional Medicaid populations and suggest that billing a Medicaid recipient directly would violate the physician’s provider agreement. This clarification has been reiterated by Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services.
Of course, physicians should be sensitive in determining whether or not missed appointment charges are appropriate for their patients. Missed appointment charges can make patients feel alienated and in some instances, the cost of collection exceeds the charge itself. If no shows are a problem, consider patterns in practice administration that may contribute to no shows. For example, the more time the patient spends in the waiting room, the more likely the patient will seek care from another physician and not bother to cancel his appointment. Additionally, research shows no-show rates are lowest when patients receive appointment reminders from office staff, rather than automated services. As the lead author of a study tracking no-shows published in the June 2010 American Journal of Medicine, Amay Parikh, M.D., concluded, “Connecting to a live person, they may feel more of a responsibility to show up."[1] Minor administrative adjustments to improve patient access may reduce no-shows without having to resort to missed appointment charges.
If it is determined, however, that imposing a missed appointment policy is appropriate for a particular physician office, then consider how the policy will work. Will there be warnings for the first missed appointment or will penalties be assessed immediately? How will patients be notified of a missed appointment? What is a reasonable amount to charge for a missed appointment? How will the charge be collected? Under what circumstances will the charge be waived, if at all? When is dismissal of a chronic offender appropriate? At first glance, the considerations seem limitless when developing a policy that will reduce both missed appointments and lost revenue while not driving patients away. On the other hand, the concept is far from novel. If airlines, masseuses, and hairdressers do it, then why can’t doctors?
Lisa English Hinkle, Member of the Lexington office, also contributed to this article and can be reached at lhinkle@mcbrayerfirm.com or (859) 231-8780, ext. 1256.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.
[1] "The Effectiveness of Outpatient Appointment Reminder Systems in Reducing No-Show Rates," abstract, American Journal of Medicine, June (www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(10)00108-7).