Contact Us
Categories
- Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights
- Medical Residents
- EMTALA
- FDA
- Reproductive Rights
- Roe v. Wade
- SCOTUS
- Medical Spas
- medical billing
- No Surprises Act
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Workplace health
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
- Code Enforcement
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- Employment Law
- FFCRA
- CARES Act
- Nursing Home Reform Act
- COVID-19
- SB 150
- Acute Care Beds
- Clinical Support
- Coronavirus
- Emergency Medical Services
- Emergency Preparedness
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- KBML
- medication assisted therapy
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Legislative Developments
- Corporate
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Employee Contracts
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Opioid Epidemic
- Sexual Harassment
- Health Resource and Services Administration
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- locum tenens
- Senate Bill 4
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- Chronic Pain Management
- HIPAA
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- Hospice
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- Drug Screening
- EHR Systems
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- ICD-10
- Mental Health Care
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Urinalysis
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- Fee for Service
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- HPSA
- KASPER
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Part D
- Pharmacists
- Physician Assistants
- Qui Tam
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Stark Laws
- Telehealth
- Affordable Care Act
- Alternative Payment Models
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Charitable Hospitals
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Hospitals
- HRSA
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- Limited Services Clinics
- Medicaid
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Medicare
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Rural Health Clinic
- Telemedicine
- APRNs
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Hydrocodone
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Webinar
- Agreed Order
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Chiropractic services
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Maintenance Standard
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- Ophthalmological services
- Overpayments
- Physician Compare website
- Re-validation
- Texting
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- Affinity Health Plan
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Appeal
- Cadillac tax
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Chronic Care Management
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Compliance Officer
- Compounding
- CPR
- Denied Claims
- Dispenser
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- Essential Health Benefits
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Food and Drug Administratio
- Form 4720
- Grace Period
- HealthCare.gov
- House Bill 3204
- ICD-9
- Individual mandate
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Kynect
- Long-term care communities
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- National Institutes of Health
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Outsourcing facility
- Physician Payments
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- State Health Plan
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- UPS
- "Plan of Correction"
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Arbitration
- Audit
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Call Coverage
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Daycare centers
- Decertification
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- EHR vendor
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- False Billings
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Health Reform
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Hospitalists
- House Bill 104
- Inpatient Care
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Licensure Requirements
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- LLC v. Sutter
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Network provider agreement
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Patient Autonomy
- Patient Privacy
- Payors
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Service Entities
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Quality reporting
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Senate Bill 39
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Upcoding
- “Superuser”
- Autism/ASD
- Center for Disease Control
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- Sunshine Act
- Abuse and Waste
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Employee Agreement
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- House Bill 1
- House Bill 4
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Pain Management Facilities
- Health Care Law
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
McBrayer Blogs
A New Day for Healthcare in Kentucky
Starting in July, practitioners may be asked to sign for mail from the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and open this to discover a “Proposed Complaint.” Thanks to a new and sweeping effort at reform in healthcare in the Commonwealth, Kentucky healthcare providers now need to know what to expect if they receive such a Proposed Complaint.
After years of discussing possible reform in the healthcare sphere, the Kentucky legislature recently passed Senate Bill 4. This new law has a wide reach as it encompasses all manner of healthcare providers, from individual physicians to health facilities and systems. Although the legislation was modeled after a similar measure in Indiana, the Kentucky version is different in ways that lead to some uncertainty as to how it may affect practitioners. This legislation now requires peer review of medical malpractice complaints by medical review panels before any such medical malpractice case could go to court. The panels must render an opinion within nine months after the proposed complaint has been filed or the plaintiff is free to bring the action in court. A complaint may bypass the panel and go directly to court only in the event that all parties agree to the same. As a practical matter, this means that all healthcare providers in receipt of a Proposed Complaint should notify their insurance carrier as soon as possible to ensure that coverage is timely triggered.
Creation of the Panel
Panels consist of an attorney panel chairperson and three healthcare providers. Each party can select one of the panel healthcare providers, and the two selected providers then select the third member. The law allows for selection of those persons in the same or similar specialty as the provider under review. All healthcare providers licensed in Kentucky to practice in his or her profession are eligible for selection to this panel, and can only be excused for “good cause” if chosen. Most believe that sufficient good cause shown will be similar to the good cause for excuse from serving on a jury. If a member of the panel fails to comply with the duties required, he or she may be sanctioned by the court. Healthcare providers in Kentucky need to be aware of their duty to serve on medical review panels if selected through this process.
Panel Process and Effect of the Panel Opinion
Once the panel is set, the parties may submit the evidence identified under the statute. The panel then is responsible for reviewing the submitted evidence and rendering an opinion as to whether the evidence supports the conclusion that a practitioner acted within the appropriate standard of care and whether this failure, if any, was a substantial factor in a negative outcome for the patient. Two members of the panel must agree on the conclusion. If the plaintiff decides to file suit after the panel renders the opinion, the opinion may be used as an expert opinion in the ensuing litigation. Notably, the panel members may be called as witnesses to testify on their review of the case.
Response to the Law
Supporters of this new law believe that the panel process will enable earlier resolution of frivolous claims and assist in reducing litigation costs that effectively drive up costs of malpractice insurance, as well as attract more quality healthcare providers to practice in Kentucky. There have been various criticisms of the law, including whether the provisions may affect a plaintiff’s access to the court system and therefore fail to pass constitutional muster. Another criticism contemplates whether this law merely adds another administrative burden to the process. The new law also requires further participation and effort from the healthcare and legal communities and will put additional demands on those already focused on caring for their patients and practice. As medical review panels go into effect, only time will tell if the goals of this law will be met in practice.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.