Contact Us
Categories
- FTC
- Emotional Support Animals
- Service Animals
- Employee Agreement
- Remote Work
- Federal Trade Commission
- LGBTQ
- Minors
- United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")
- Work from Home
- Arbitration
- Workplace health
- Trade Secrets
- Corporate
- Center for Disease Control
- Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
- FFCRA
- Opioid Epidemic
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- COVID-19
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- H.R.6201
- Health Care Law
- IRS
- Paid Sick Leave
- Temporary Leave
- Treasury
- Coronavirus
- Worker Misclassification
- Labor Law
- Overtime
- Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission
- Sexual Harassment
- FMLA Retaliation
- Overtime Rule
- Employer Wellness Programs
- Employment Non-Discrimination Act ("ENDA")
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Independent Contractors
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Paid Time Off ("PTO")
- Sick Employees
- Wage and Hour
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Discrimination Laws
- ERISA
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Human Resource Department
- Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”)
- OSHA
- Overtime Pay
- Social Media
- Social Media Policies
- U.S. Department of Labor
- Union
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”)
- Adverse Employment Action
- Amazon
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Bring Your Own Device
- BYOD
- Civil Rights
- Compliance
- Copyright
- Department of Labor ("DOL")
- EEOC
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Misconduct
- Employment Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”)
- Intellectual Property
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Security Screening
- Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Uncategorized
- Volunteer
- Work for Hire
- Young v. UPS
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Federal contractors
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet’s Occupational Safety and Health Program (KOSH)
- Micro-unit
- Security Checks
- Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile
- Cloud
- Creech v. Brown
- EEOC v. Hill Country Farms
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp.
- Lane v. Franks
- Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA")
- Non-exempt employees
- Northwestern
- Shazor v. Prof’l Transit Mgmt.
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
- Whistleblower
- "Ban-the-box"
- 2013)
- At-will employment
- Berrier v. Bizer
- Bullying
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Chenzira v. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
- Companionship services
- Compensatory time off
- Conestoga Woods Specialties v. Sebelius
- Consumer Credit Protection Act (“CCPA”)
- Crystalline Silica
- Davis-Bacon and Related Acts
- Drug-Free Workplaces
- Earnings
- Ehling v. Monmouth-Ocean Hospital Service Corp.
- Federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”)
- Government employees
- Government shutdown
- Home Health Care Workers
- Illness and Injury Reports
- Job applications
- Jury duty
- Kentucky Department of Workers’ Claims
- Kentucky Wage and Hour Act
- KYSHRM 2013
- Mandatory vaccination policies
- Maternity Leave
- McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act
- NFL Bullying Scandal
- Payroll
- Permissible Exposure Level ("PEL")
- Private employers
- Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores
- Senate Bill 157
- SHRM
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- Violence
- Wage garnishment
- WorkSmart Kentucky
- COBRA
- Defamation
- Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”)
- EEOC v. Fabricut
- EEOC v. The Founders Pavilion
- Employee Hazards
- Employee of the Month Programs
- Employee Training
- Employer Group Health Plans
- Employer Mandate
- Employment Practices Liability Insurance
- Endorsements
- Federal Workplace Agencies
- FICA
- Freedom of Speech
- Gatto v. United Airlines and allied Aviation Services
- Giant Food LLC
- Health-Contingent Wellness Programs
- HIPAA
- Litigation
- Madry v. Gibraltar National Corporation
- Medical Exams
- Megivern v. Glacier Hills Incorporated
- Motivating Factor
- Obesity
- Online Account Protection
- Online Defamation
- Participatory Wellness Programs
- Pennington v. Wagner’s Pharmacy
- Pension Plans
- Play or Pay
- Record Retention
- Reference checks
- Sequester
- Severance Pay
- Social Media Ownership
- Supervisor
- Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits
- Tangible employment actions
- Tax Refund
- Title VII retaliation cases
- Troyer v. T.John.E Productions
- Unfair Labor Practice
- United States v. Quality Stores
- United States v. Windsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar
- Vance v. Ball State University
- Contraceptive Mandate
- Employee Arrests
- Employee Forms
- Employee photographs
- Form I-9
- House Labor and Industry Committee
- Job Description
- Job Requirement
- Kentucky’s Whistleblower Act
- KRS 391.170
- Municipal Liability
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Posting Requirements
- Public Sector Liability
- Religious Employer
- Right to Work Bill
- Social Privacy Laws
- Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP)
- Telecommuting
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.
- Wilson v. City of Central City
- Workplace Politics
- Class Action Waivers
- Criminal Background Checks
- Crisis Management
- Employee Performance Reviews
- Employee Personnel Files
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)
- Federal Department of Labor
- Informal Discussion Letter (“EEOC Letter”)
- Kentucky Labor Cabinet
- Labor and Pensions ("HELP")
- PhoneDog v. Kravitz
- Salary Threshold
- Social Networking Online Protection Act (SNOP)
- Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Business Insurance
- Communications Decency Act
- Employee Contracts
- Hiring and Firing
- Hosanna-Tabor Opinion
- Insurance Coverage
- Internet & Media Law
- Internet Defamation
- National Labor Relations Act
- Non-Compete Agreement
- Retaliation by Association
- Unemployment Benefits
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
- USERRA
The Ties That Bind: Is Your Arbitration Agreement Enforceable and Binding
Arbitration agreements are effective mechanisms to resolve employment disputes more efficiently and affordably than traditional litigation. They are becoming standard practice in most at-will employment situations, and for good reason. They provide a simple and informal way to resolve employment disputes, as they are relatively inexpensive, more expedient, and reduce legal costs by avoiding the expense of litigation. Most employers have either already implemented an arbitration agreement program for their employees or have considered it. But are they enforceable?
The answer, fortunately, is yes, but it is important to keep in mind the most basic characteristic of arbitration agreements—they are contracts. Both Federal and State laws foster a strong policy favoring arbitration, but each provides that the enforceability of agreements requiring arbitration for work-related disputes will be determined by applicable state law regarding contract principles.[1] For instance Kentucky law, similar to most states, provides that written agreements to submit to arbitration are “enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law for the revocation of any contract”.[2] In essence, if the agreement constitutes a valid contract, then it is an enforceable arbitration agreement. But what are the grounds that exist for the revocation of a contract—an arbitration agreement?
The majority of published case law suggests that arbitration agreements are most commonly challenged on the basis that they lack mutuality of contract, lack adequate consideration for the contract, or are unconscionable. These tripping blocks can be easily avoided by drafting a carefully-worded arbitration agreement and providing employees ample notice and opportunity to review the agreement.
Some things to keep in mind in drafting and implementing arbitration agreements:
Both parties to the contract must be mutually bound to arbitrate—the agreement must not permit the employer to litigate, while limiting the employee to arbitration as his or her only means for dispute resolution. In addition, an employer can take certain actions to make contracts with their employees more mutual. For example, the contract may provide that both the employee and the employer share the same right to select or reject the arbitrator; the employer will pay for arbitration expenses; the arbitration will be held at a place agreed upon or convenient to the employee; and that the employee is guaranteed the right to an attorney throughout arbitration.
At will employment can be conditioned upon the employee’s acceptance of an arbitration agreement, but such acceptance must be knowing and voluntary. An employer and employee are mutually waiving the write to pursue their claims and defenses in Court, it is important that the employer ensure that the employee has notice of the agreement, understands it, and knowingly assents to it. Employers should keep in mind factors such as the employee’s background and knowledge, the amount of time the employee has to decide whether to sign or assent to the agreement, the clarity of the waiver, consideration for the waiver, and the circumstances surrounding the waiver.[3] It is not required that the waiver be made expressly or even signed as an employee can assent through action, such as by remaining employed.[4] However, it is important that the employee be made fully aware of the agreement.
Consideration is especially important in determining the enforceability of a particular arbitration agreement. The presence of adequate consideration is a prerequisite for finding any contract enforceable. In the employment context, “[a]greements to arbitrate as a condition of employment constitute consideration and are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act.”[5] Mutuality and consideration are closely related, for “even if the arbitration agreement was not a condition of employment, an arbitration clause requiring both parties to submit equally to arbitration constitutes adequate consideration.”[6] The adequacy of the consideration is based on the mutual obligation held by both parties. Where “both are equally bound and obligated to arbitrate disputes,” the agreement is enforceable.[7] Where parties are held to equal standards and are given comparable rights under the terms of the contract, arbitration clauses are more likely to be enforced.
Even where mutuality and consideration are found, to be enforceable the arbitration clause must not be found to be unconscionable. Contracts which do not include unreasonable or oppressive terms, and which are entered into under conditions favorable to the employee’s ability to fairly consider his options before signing [or assenting] are generally found to be conscionable and therefore enforceable.[8] An employer who seeks to include an arbitration clause in employment contracts should inform employees that their signature is not required to bind them, and that continued work and acceptance of employment benefits will be deemed as accepting and entering into an agreement to arbitrate. Be careful, however, that you don’t overreach with the agreement. Because the employer is the drafter of the agreement and can demand acceptance as a condition of employment, it is important not to limit the rights and remedies available to employees through arbitration. The contract terms should allow for an employee to pursue all remedies he/she may have against the employer, but require those remedies to be pursued only through arbitration. The inclusion of fair contract terms, combined with conditions and circumstances amenable to the employee’s ability to make a sound decision, will increase the likelihood that an arbitration agreement will be upheld.
Remember, when drafting your arbitration agreement, make sure your agreement does not limit your employee’s substantive rights and remedies, and make sure the agreement mutually and equally obligates you and the employee to arbitration. When entering into arbitration agreements with your employees, give them ample time to review the agreement and explain to them that by continuing and accepting the benefits of their employment they are agreeing to the contract. And most importantly, consult with your legal team regularly to ensure that you have drafted and are implementing a binding and enforceable arbitration agreement.
Services may be performed by others.
This article does not constitute legal advice.
[1] See Seawright v. American General Financial Services, Inc., 507 F.3d 967 (6th Cir. 2007).
[2] Kentucky Revised Statutes 417.050
[3] Id; see also Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 317 F.3d 646. 668 (6th Cir. 2003).
[4] See Seawright, 507 F.3d at 974.
[5] Kruse v. AFLAC Int’l, Inc., 458 F.Supp.2d 375, 385 (E.D.Ky. 2006).
[6] Id.
[7] Seawright, 507 F.3d at 972.
[8] See Shadeh v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 334 F.Supp.2d 938, (W.D.Ky. 2004).